|
||
|---|---|---|
1: What is a group action? |
There
is a common thread in the ideas of non-singular linear transformations
acting on a vector space and D4 acting on the corners,
or the diagonals of a square.
In each case we have a group G a set X and a mapping q: G x X -> X, denoted (g,x) |-> xg , satisfying:
Such a mapping is called a group G acting on a set X. Here is another way of looking at it: Suppose
q
is an action of G on X. Define a mapping y:
G
-> SymX, the group of permutations of X by gy:
x |-> xg. First it must be checked that gy
in SymX. This is true because it is a mapping from X
to X which is 1 - 1 and onto because it has an inverse g-1.y.
Now you can check that y
is a homomorphism, because for all g and h in G (gh)y
does the same to any x in X as
This shows that every group action of G on X gives rise to a homomorphism y: G -> SymX. Conversely, given a homomorphism y: G -> SymX, define an action q of G on X by (g,x) |-> x g. It is straightforward to check that q satisfies the axioms of a group action. Thus we have the complete logical equivalence of a group G acting on a set X and a homomorphism of G into SymX. Group actions can be used for studying the set X, especially if it has some other structure, like a graph, vector space or module, but its most important use in this course will be for studying the structure of the group G. Another name for a homomorphism y: G -> SymX is a permutation representation of G in X or in SymX.
|
. |
2: Linear representations |
By the
way, a homomorphism of a group G into GL(V) for some vector space
V is called a linear representation of G. Examples are the
representations of the symmetry groups of the square and cube by non-singular
matrices with entries 0, 1 and -1 we looked at earlier.
The kernel of a representation of G or action of G on X is just the kernel of y, i.e. the set {g in G: for all x in X, xg = x}. A representation or action is called faithful if it has kernel zero, and transitive if for all x and y in X there is some g in G such that xg = y. Note that this is not the same as saying that y is onto. It is however equivalent to the following statement: let x be a fixed element of X. Then for all y in X there is a g in G such that y = xg.
|
. |
3: Orbits of group actions |
If x
in X, the orbit of x is the
set {xg: g in G}. At first sight, it looks like the orbit
of x is the same size as G, but this is false in general, because
there may be many g and h in G with xg = xh.
What we can say however is:
Lemma 4.1 The set of orbits in X of G is a partition of X. Proof It is enough to prove that being in the same orbit is an eqivalence relation on X.
Notice that if G acts on X and H is a subgroup of G, then H also acts on X and the orbits of X under H are subsets of the orbits of X under G, and thus induce a finer partition of X. On the other hand, we have: Lemma 4.2 Let G be a group acting on a set X, and let Y be a subset of X. Then the action of G on X induces an action of G on Y if and only if Y is a union of orbits of X under G.
|
. |
4.Fixed groups of actions |
Now
suppose that x is an element of X and let
Gx = {a in G: x a = x}. Lemma 4.3 Gx is a subgroup of G. Moreover there is a 1-1 correspondence between the orbit of x under the action of G and the cosets of Gx in G. Proof. Denote the orbit of x by Orb(x)
and the set of cosets by [G:Gx]. Define F: Orb(x)
-> [G:Gx] by
F is well-defined, for if x a = x b, then a.b-1 fixes x. Hence a.b-1 in Gx, so Gxa = Gxb. F is 1-1, for if Gxa
= Gxb
then a.b-1
in Gx, so
F is onto, for if Gxa is a coset, it is the image under F of x a. Corollary 7.4 If G is a finite group acting on any set X, then the orbits of elements of X are finite. Moreover, their length divides the order of G.
|
. |
5: Examples |
It's
time for some examples.
|
. |
Go to Table of Contents.
Last update: 10 October, 1999
Author: Phill Schultz, schultz@maths.uwa.edu.au