Consulting Experience


1. Development work

Here is a brief description of all the projects in which I have been involved since the start of my academic career.

2. Ongoing consultancy work

This type of work is always a rewarding experience: the friendship and generosity of local staff is overwhelming, they clearly appreciate my presence in their part of the world, and it is humbling to see how they cope with very limited personal and academic resources. At all times, my aim is to

TASEAP

In mid 1995, on my own initiative, I prepared a 4pp submission to AusAID concerning the Thailand-Australia Science and Engineering Assistance Project (TASEAP): this was aimed at winning government support for my department to coordinate the mathematics component of TASEAP and was based on my colleagues' experience of giving short courses in Thailand over many years. My submission was subsequently adopted by all except one of the organisations short-listed to manage the project.

Although in the end my department was unsuccessful in its application, staff at the Pattani campus of the Prince of Songkla University contacted me asking if they could visit my department in March 1997 to discuss the possibility of their students undertaking postgraduate study at UWA in the future.


PROBE

In June 1995, I also expressed a personal interest in the Philippines-Australia Project in Basic Education (PROBE): this was an AusAID-funded project aimed at upgrading the quality of primary and secondary teaching of English, Science and Mathematics in the Philippines. It was managed by the "Queensland Education Consortium" which linked the Queensland Department of Education, the Queensland University of Technology, and the University of Queensland. I was chosen as the Elementary and Secondary Mathematics Teacher Education Adviser for the project . My input to PROBE was to consist of 9 months work in the Philippines spread over 4-5 years, starting in October 1996. During those months I would conduct workshops for Teacher Education Instructors (TEI's) and help them to implement a new curriculum for the education of mathematics teachers; and that in turn would involve me in the preparation of new materials for classroom use.

According to pp 6-18 of the Feasibility Study for the project, it seems that PROBE was conceived after the Government of the Philippines (GOP) approached AIDAB for assistance with its plans to improve its education system (section 1.1.1); that PROBE will comprise four substantial components (section 1.2.1) and will avoid problems experienced in other projects (para 4 on p 12); and that the Government of Australia (GOA) will contribute over $24 million to the project (para 2 on p 13). In fact, PROBE will "build on the achievements of PASMEP (Philippines-Australia Science and Mathematics Education Project)" (section 2.1.2) to which staff at WACAE and Curtin University made a substantial contribution in 1989. However, I would be the only West Australian consultant for PROBE.

It also appears that GOA regarded PROBE as its "flagship" project in the Philippines as it would consolidate the achievements of earlier projects and promote further successes in the same area (section 2.2.2). To achieve these goals, PROBE would use Australian academics (over 20 of them, in fact) who are interested in teacher education and in South East Asia (section 2.2.3): my appointment came after I responded to an Australia-wide advertisement in July 1995. The significance of PROBE is also indicated by the fact that its commencement was reported in an issue of UWA's "Campus Review".

However, I withdrew from the project after I observed its management and expectations, while working in-country for one month during October 1996.